PuniCodex

The Canonical Register · No. 174

Hoderi — the one true spelling, and the forms that fail it

Fire, Fisherman

Tier 2 Hoderi
Hoderi — Fire, Fisherman
By PuniCodex Team · · 4 min read

Hoderi — the one true spelling, and the forms that fail it

Court is in session. In the matter of Hoderi, the register hears the evidence — the attestation, the marks, and the forms that stand accused.

At a Glance

The Charge

That the name Hoderi is routinely written in forms that move, drop, or invent its marks — and that each such form teaches the reader a different, lesser name. The register's task is to separate the honest fallback from the outright false.

The Defense of the Canonical Form

The name is attested as 火照命, on the evidence Kojiki (Hoderi and Hoori cycle) and Nihon Shoki (parallel imperial genealogy) set down. On the evidence, it means "Fire-shining". The canonical transliteration is Hoderi.

No diacritics are required here: the canonical form is the exactness of the spelling itself, the form Hepburn with macrons — ō and ū marked, never collapsed to o/u or rewritten ou demands.

The Character Witness

The plain form hoderi differs from the canonical Hoderi only by convention of display — case, not content. It is acceptable everywhere: in legacy systems, in plain-text citation, in the DNS itself. What is not acceptable is what follows in the register: respellings that change the letters, not just their case.

Mitigating Circumstances

No alternate form of this name carries documented scholarly support in the lexicon's record. The convention here — Hepburn with macrons — ō and ū marked, never collapsed to o/u or rewritten ou — produces exactly one defensible transliteration: Hoderi. Forms that differ from it are not contested; they are simply wrong.

The Convention's Own History

Every tradition in this register has its own scholarly transliteration standard, built by its own specialists over decades or centuries, and the register follows each on its own terms: Hepburn with macrons — ō and ū marked, never collapsed to o/u or rewritten ou. The principle that unifies them is the one the whole project stands on: a name is evidence, and evidence is not negotiable — not for keyboards, not for convenience, not for anyone.

Registration, Honestly

Three facts govern every domain this project registers. One: IDNA 2008 welcomes the marks — punycode encodes them legally and browsers show them faithfully. Two: welcome is not availability — registrars hold partial inventory, so the ideal form of a name may exist in the protocol yet not in the shop window today. Three: typeability is a separate virtue — a form no one can type on a phone is a form no one will visit, however canonical.

Hence the hierarchy the rulebook enforces: take the most complete form that is both attested and actually registrable, and never accept a wrong mark for the sake of availability. The wrong accent is not a rung on that ladder; it is off the ladder entirely.

The Verdict

So the register finds: Hoderi, canonical; hoderi, equally canonical; the contested forms, recorded with their support; the false forms, ruled against with their violations named. Every line of that finding cites its evidence, and the evidence is open to any reader — the register asks to be checked, not trusted. The temple keeps the canonical form at /hoderi/.

The docket for this ruling: no false forms on the docket; no contested forms attested; the attestation rests on 3 cited sources — Kojiki (Hoderi and Hoori cycle), Nihon Shoki (parallel imperial genealogy), Philippi, Kojiki.

The Register Continues

This is one of 437 entries in the Canonical Register — the authoritative reference for every flagship temple. The temple's founding dispatch tells the name's story; its Restoration File details the marks; its Resonance File reads the archetype into the industries. The blog index holds the whole archive, and the Rulebook states the convention this register enforces.

Continue the register — previous entry: Hestía (read it) · next entry: Hokkaidō (read it).

The Canonical Register is written from the same canonical record as the lexicon itself. If a false form is missing from this page, it is because the evidence does not support calling it false — or because we have not seen it yet. Show us, with a citation, and the register will answer.

japaneseTier 2canonicalThe Canonical Register