Fuji: canonical, contested, and the false forms on record
Evidence dossier 133 — Fuji. Every exhibit catalogued, every ruling stated with its grounds.
At a Glance
- Canonical form: Fuji
- Original script: 富士
- Pantheon: Japanese
- Convention: Hepburn with macrons — ō and ū marked, never collapsed to o/u or rewritten ou
- False forms on record: 0
- Contested forms: none attested
- Series: The Canonical Register, No. 133 of 437
The Evidence
Exhibit 1 — the attestation. The name is attested as 富士, on the evidence Kojiki and Nihon Shoki (geographic and kami references) and Earhart, Mount Fuji: Icon of Japan set down. On the evidence, it means "Wealthy warrior". The canonical transliteration is Fuji.
Exhibit 2 — the flattened form. The plain form fuji differs from the canonical Fuji only by convention of display — case, not content. It is acceptable everywhere: in legacy systems, in plain-text citation, in the DNS itself. What is not acceptable is what follows in the register: respellings that change the letters, not just their case.
Exhibit 3 — the physical record. Fuji is surrounded by Sengen shrines, of which Fujisan Hongū Sengen Taisha is the head. Medieval and Edo-period pilgrimage routes, lodges, and memorial stones dot the slopes and base. The 1707 Hōei eruption left extensive tephra deposits around the Edo region.
Exhibit 4 — the continuing record. Fuji was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 2013 and remains Japan's most photographed and climbed mountain. Its image appears on banknotes, passports, and countless works of art.
The Convention's Own History
Every tradition in this register has its own scholarly transliteration standard, built by its own specialists over decades or centuries, and the register follows each on its own terms: Hepburn with macrons — ō and ū marked, never collapsed to o/u or rewritten ou. The principle that unifies them is the one the whole project stands on: a name is evidence, and evidence is not negotiable — not for keyboards, not for convenience, not for anyone.
The Protocol's Position
Can the canonical form live in the address bar? Almost always, yes. IDNA 2008 admits every mark this register defends — the DNS stores them as `xn--` punycode and modern browsers render them natively. The real frictions are practical, not legal: some registrars stock only part of the IDN space, so a theoretically valid name can be temporarily unbuyable; and stacked combinations (an acute riding a macron) remain awkward to type on mobile keyboards even where the protocol accepts them.
The project's answer is a ranked ladder, not a compromise: the full restoration first, then attested fallbacks in descending order of completeness. The ladder's lowest rung, plain ASCII, is a vehicle for legacy systems — sanctioned, but never presented as the scholarly form.
The Verdict
Case closed on Fuji: canonical, cited, and defended. The keyboard form fuji is the same name in another register of display — always acceptable. The register's files remain open: if a source surfaces that changes any line of this entry, the entry changes. Until then, the temple at /fuji/ holds the canonical form.
The docket for this ruling: no false forms on the docket; no contested forms attested; the attestation rests on 3 cited sources — Kojiki and Nihon Shoki (geographic and kami references), Earhart, Mount Fuji: Icon of Japan, Hokusai, Thirty-Six Views of Mount Fuji.
The Register Continues
This is one of 437 entries in the Canonical Register — the authoritative reference for every flagship temple. The temple's founding dispatch tells the name's story; its Restoration File details the marks; its Resonance File reads the archetype into the industries. The blog index holds the whole archive, and the Rulebook states the convention this register enforces.
Continue the register — previous entry: Frigg (read it) · next entry: Fūjin (read it).
The Canonical Register is written from the same canonical record as the lexicon itself. If a false form is missing from this page, it is because the evidence does not support calling it false — or because we have not seen it yet. Show us, with a citation, and the register will answer.