Yām: canonical, contested, and the false forms on record

Court is in session. In the matter of Yām, the register hears the evidence — the attestation, the marks, and the forms that stand accused.

At a Glance

• Canonical form: Yām
• Original script: 𐎊𐎎
• Pantheon: Canaanite
• Convention: Ugaritic/Phoenician scholarly convention with matres and gutturals shown
• False forms on record: 1
• Contested forms: 1
• Series: The Canonical Register, No. 282 of 287

The Charge

That the name Yām is routinely written in forms that move, drop, or invent its marks — and that each such form teaches the reader a different, lesser name. The register's task is to separate the honest fallback from the outright false.

The Defense of the Canonical Form

The attested form is 𐎊𐎎, from the tradition's own record. The canonical transliteration is Yām.

Every mark is evidence, and every piece of evidence is checkable:

• a → ā — Macron: long a: the vowel length, as the sources give it.

The Character Witness

The plain form yam is not false — it is a fallback, and the register is exact about what that means. In systems that cannot carry diacritics (legacy databases, older tooling, parts of the address-bar pipeline) the flattened form is the accepted vehicle, and the rulebook names it explicitly as the final rung of the fallback hierarchy: full restoration first, circumflex where attested, macron-only by the academic standard, an attested variant, and only then plain ASCII.

What the fallback status forbids is promotion: yam may carry the name where marks are impossible, but it may not represent the name where marks are possible. Every mark it drops — a → ā — is a fact the sources recorded. A fallback is a vehicle, never the primary.

Cross-Examination

The witness Yam

Where it comes from: the publisher compromise — older books and hurried websites that print the "English equivalent" as if it were the name itself. Why it cannot stand: every substitution here (ā→a) is a romanization of convenience, not an attested spelling — it teaches the reader to guess, not to read.

Mitigating Circumstances

Not every non-canonical form is false. These forms carry real scholarly support — they are recorded in the lexicon as variants, with their sources, and the register presents them honestly rather than pretending unanimity:

• Yammu — Nominative case form in Ugaritic scholarly transliteration. Support: KTU.

The canonical form stands above the contested ones here by weight of evidence, not by decree. If the scholarship shifts, the register shifts with it — that is what "canonical" means when it is honest.

The Convention's Own History

Every tradition in this register has its own scholarly transliteration standard, built by its own specialists over decades or centuries, and the register follows each on its own terms: Ugaritic/Phoenician scholarly convention with matres and gutturals shown. The principle that unifies them is the one the whole project stands on: a name is evidence, and evidence is not negotiable — not for keyboards, not for convenience, not for anyone.

Registration, Honestly

Three facts govern every domain this project registers. One: IDNA 2008 welcomes the marks — punycode encodes them legally and browsers show them faithfully. Two: welcome is not availability — registrars hold partial inventory, so the ideal form of a name may exist in the protocol yet not in the shop window today. Three: typeability is a separate virtue — a form no one can type on a phone is a form no one will visit, however canonical.

Hence the hierarchy the rulebook enforces: take the most complete form that is both attested and actually registrable, and never accept a wrong mark for the sake of availability. The wrong accent is not a rung on that ladder; it is off the ladder entirely.

The Verdict

So the register finds: Yām, canonical; yam, a sanctioned fallback; the contested forms, recorded with their support; the false forms, ruled against with their violations named. Every line of that finding cites its evidence, and the evidence is open to any reader — the register asks to be checked, not trusted. The temple keeps the canonical form at /sites/yam/.

The docket for this ruling: 1 false form ruled against, Yam first on the docket; 1 preserved mark verified: a → ā; 1 contested form recorded with its support.

The Register Continues

The register holds 287 entries like this one — each temple with its own ruling. Read the temple's founding dispatch for the story, its Restoration File for the philology, its Resonance File for the industries, or the whole archive end to end.

Continue the register — previous entry: Xōlōtl (read it) · next entry: Yamunā (read it).

The Canonical Register is written from the same canonical record as the lexicon itself. If a false form is missing from this page, it is because the evidence does not support calling it false — or because we have not seen it yet. Show us, with a citation, and the register will answer.