Duryodhana: canonical, contested, and the false forms on record
Court is in session. In the matter of Duryodhana, the register hears the evidence — the attestation, the marks, and the forms that stand accused.
At a Glance
- Canonical form: Duryodhana
- Original script: दुर्योधन
- Pantheon: Sanskrit
- Convention: IAST — macrons for long vowels, underdots for retroflexes, the International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration
- False forms on record: 1
- Contested forms: none attested
- Series: The Canonical Register, No. 145 of 597
The Charge
That the name Duryodhana is routinely written in forms that move, drop, or invent its marks — and that each such form teaches the reader a different, lesser name. The register's task is to separate the honest fallback from the outright false.
The Defense of the Canonical Form
The name is attested as दुर्योधन, in the attestation Mahābhārata, Ādi Parvan (the birth) and Mahābhārata, Sabhā Parvan (the dice game) give us. On the evidence, it means "'Hard to Conquer in Battle' (dur- 'hard' + yodhana 'fighting') — the eldest Kaurava, rival of the Pāṇḍavas whose refusal to yield their share of the kingdom brings about the Kurukṣetra war". The canonical transliteration is Duryodhana.
No diacritics are required here: the canonical form is the exactness of the spelling itself, the form IAST — macrons for long vowels, underdots for retroflexes, the International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration demands.
The Character Witness
The plain form duryodhana differs from the canonical Duryodhana only by convention of display — case, not content. It is acceptable everywhere: in legacy systems, in plain-text citation, in the DNS itself. What is not acceptable is what follows in the register: respellings that change the letters, not just their case.
Cross-Examination
The witness duryodana
Where it comes from: the anglicized respelling — the name written the way English guesses it sounds. Why it cannot stand: rewrites attested consonant clusters to fit English spelling habits; every cluster simplified this way erases a letter the sources write.
Mitigating Circumstances
No alternate form of this name carries documented scholarly support in the lexicon's record. The convention here — IAST — macrons for long vowels, underdots for retroflexes, the International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration — produces exactly one defensible transliteration: Duryodhana. Forms that differ from it are not contested; they are simply wrong.
The Convention's Own History
IAST — the International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration — was settled in 1912 at the International Congress of Orientalists in Athens, but its logic is far older: Sanskrit grammar (Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī, fourth century BCE) is the most precise phonological system the ancient world produced, and it distinguishes retroflex from dental consonants as carriers of meaning. The underdots of IAST (ṭ, ḍ, ṇ, ṣ, ṛ) exist because Sanskrit treats those as different letters, not flavors of one letter. The macrons mark long vowels that are, again, phonemically distinct. A romanization that flattens them does not simplify Sanskrit; it misspells it.
Registration, Honestly
Three facts govern every domain this project registers. One: IDNA 2008 welcomes the marks — punycode encodes them legally and browsers show them faithfully. Two: welcome is not availability — registrars hold partial inventory, so the ideal form of a name may exist in the protocol yet not in the shop window today. Three: typeability is a separate virtue — a form no one can type on a phone is a form no one will visit, however canonical.
Hence the hierarchy the rulebook enforces: take the most complete form that is both attested and actually registrable, and never accept a wrong mark for the sake of availability. The wrong accent is not a rung on that ladder; it is off the ladder entirely.
The Verdict
So the register finds: Duryodhana, canonical; duryodhana, equally canonical; the contested forms, recorded with their support; the false forms, ruled against with their violations named. Every line of that finding cites its evidence, and the evidence is open to any reader — the register asks to be checked, not trusted. The temple keeps the canonical form at /duryodhana/.
The docket for this ruling: 1 false form ruled against, duryodana first on the docket; no contested forms attested; the attestation rests on 4 cited sources — Mahābhārata, Ādi Parvan (the birth), Mahābhārata, Sabhā Parvan (the dice game), Mahābhārata, Udyoga Parvan (the refusal).
The Register Continues
The register holds 597 entries like this one — each temple with its own ruling. Read the temple's founding dispatch for the story, its Restoration File for the philology, its Resonance File for the industries, or the whole archive end to end.
Continue the register — previous entry: Durgā (read it) · next entry: Ēa (read it).
The Canonical Register is written from the same canonical record as the lexicon itself. If a false form is missing from this page, it is because the evidence does not support calling it false — or because we have not seen it yet. Show us, with a citation, and the register will answer.