The canonical register: Tlāloc

Court is in session. In the matter of Tlāloc, the register hears the evidence — the attestation, the marks, and the forms that stand accused.

At a Glance

• Canonical form: Tlāloc
• Original script: —
• Pantheon: Nahuatl
• Convention: the tradition’s own scholarly transliteration standard
• False forms on record: 1
• Contested forms: none attested
• Series: The Canonical Register, No. 258 of 287

The Charge

That the name Tlāloc is routinely written in forms that move, drop, or invent its marks — and that each such form teaches the reader a different, lesser name. The register's task is to separate the honest fallback from the outright false.

The Defense of the Canonical Form

The tradition's record preserves this name in its romanized scholarly form: Tlāloc — no older script survives to transcribe, so the canonical content is the exactness of the spelling itself.

Every mark is evidence, and every piece of evidence is checkable:

• a → ā — Macron: long vowel: the vowel length, as the sources give it.

The Character Witness

The plain form tlaloc is not false — it is a fallback, and the register is exact about what that means. In systems that cannot carry diacritics (legacy databases, older tooling, parts of the address-bar pipeline) the flattened form is the accepted vehicle, and the rulebook names it explicitly as the final rung of the fallback hierarchy: full restoration first, circumflex where attested, macron-only by the academic standard, an attested variant, and only then plain ASCII.

What the fallback status forbids is promotion: tlaloc may carry the name where marks are impossible, but it may not represent the name where marks are possible. Every mark it drops — a → ā — is a fact the sources recorded. A fallback is a vehicle, never the primary.

Cross-Examination

The witness Tlaloc

Where it comes from: the publisher compromise — older books and hurried websites that print the "English equivalent" as if it were the name itself. Why it cannot stand: every substitution here (ā→a) is a romanization of convenience, not an attested spelling — it teaches the reader to guess, not to read.

Mitigating Circumstances

No alternate form of this name carries documented scholarly support in the lexicon's record. The convention here — the tradition’s standard — produces exactly one defensible transliteration: Tlāloc. Forms that differ from it are not contested; they are simply wrong.

The Convention's Own History

Every tradition in this register has its own scholarly transliteration standard, built by its own specialists over decades or centuries, and the register follows each on its own terms: the tradition’s own standard. The principle that unifies them is the one the whole project stands on: a name is evidence, and evidence is not negotiable — not for keyboards, not for convenience, not for anyone.

Registration, Honestly

Three facts govern every domain this project registers. One: IDNA 2008 welcomes the marks — punycode encodes them legally and browsers show them faithfully. Two: welcome is not availability — registrars hold partial inventory, so the ideal form of a name may exist in the protocol yet not in the shop window today. Three: typeability is a separate virtue — a form no one can type on a phone is a form no one will visit, however canonical.

Hence the hierarchy the rulebook enforces: take the most complete form that is both attested and actually registrable, and never accept a wrong mark for the sake of availability. The wrong accent is not a rung on that ladder; it is off the ladder entirely.

The Verdict

So the register finds: Tlāloc, canonical; tlaloc, a sanctioned fallback; the contested forms, recorded with their support; the false forms, ruled against with their violations named. Every line of that finding cites its evidence, and the evidence is open to any reader — the register asks to be checked, not trusted. The temple keeps the canonical form at /sites/tlaloc/.

The docket for this ruling: 1 false form ruled against, Tlaloc first on the docket; 1 preserved mark verified: a → ā; no contested forms attested; the attestation rests on 5 cited sources — Sahagún, Florentine Codex, Karttunen, An Analytical Dictionary of Nahuatl, Durán, Book of the Gods and Rites.

The Register Continues

The register holds 287 entries like this one — each temple with its own ruling. Read the temple's founding dispatch for the story, its Restoration File for the philology, its Resonance File for the industries, or the whole archive end to end.

Continue the register — previous entry: Tiāndì (read it) · next entry: Tlāltēcuhtli (read it).

The Canonical Register is written from the same canonical record as the lexicon itself. If a false form is missing from this page, it is because the evidence does not support calling it false — or because we have not seen it yet. Show us, with a citation, and the register will answer.