Šəlōmōh: canonical, contested, and the false forms on record

The internet spells Šəlōmōh more ways than one, and only one of them is the name the sources wrote. This is the register's ruling — canonical, fallback, contested, and false, each in its proper place.

At a Glance

• Canonical form: Šəlōmōh
• Original script: שְׁלֹמֹה
• Pantheon: Canaanite
• Convention: Ugaritic/Phoenician scholarly convention with matres and gutturals shown
• False forms on record: 2
• Contested forms: none attested
• Series: The Canonical Register, No. 239 of 287

The Canonical Form

The attested form is שְׁלֹמֹה, from the tradition's own record. The canonical transliteration is Šəlōmōh.

Every mark is evidence, and every piece of evidence is checkable:

• o → ō — Macron: long vowel: the vowel length, as the sources give it.
• o → ō — Macron: long vowel: the vowel length, as the sources give it.

Where the Flattened Form Stands

The plain form solomon is not false — it is a fallback, and the register is exact about what that means. In systems that cannot carry diacritics (legacy databases, older tooling, parts of the address-bar pipeline) the flattened form is the accepted vehicle, and the rulebook names it explicitly as the final rung of the fallback hierarchy: full restoration first, circumflex where attested, macron-only by the academic standard, an attested variant, and only then plain ASCII.

What the fallback status forbids is promotion: solomon may carry the name where marks are impossible, but it may not represent the name where marks are possible. Every mark it drops — o → ō, o → ō — is a fact the sources recorded. A fallback is a vehicle, never the primary.

The Register of False Forms

False form 1: Šəlomoh

Origin: the publisher compromise — older books and hurried websites that print the "English equivalent" as if it were the name itself.

Violation: every substitution here (ō→o) is a romanization of convenience, not an attested spelling — it teaches the reader to guess, not to read.

False form 2: Šəlômôh

Origin: the near-miss — a form that looks right at a glance and circulates on wikis and forums.

Violation: a macron (length) is not a circumflex (quality/tone) — they answer different questions.

The Contested Forms

No alternate form of this name carries documented scholarly support in the lexicon's record. The convention here — Ugaritic/Phoenician scholarly convention with matres and gutturals shown — produces exactly one defensible transliteration: Šəlōmōh. Forms that differ from it are not contested; they are simply wrong.

The Convention's Own History

Every tradition in this register has its own scholarly transliteration standard, built by its own specialists over decades or centuries, and the register follows each on its own terms: Ugaritic/Phoenician scholarly convention with matres and gutturals shown. The principle that unifies them is the one the whole project stands on: a name is evidence, and evidence is not negotiable — not for keyboards, not for convenience, not for anyone.

What the Address Bar Allows

IDNA 2008 permits the letters these restorations use — macrons, acutes, underdots, thorn, ogonek, the lot — and the DNS carries them as punycode (`xn--` labels). Two honest constraints remain. First, registrar inventory: the protocol permits a character; the registrar's stock decides whether the exact domain can be bought today. Second, combined marks: forms like Apṓllōn (acute stacked on a macron) are philologically ideal yet effectively untypeable on phones and unsupported across much of the registration system.

That is why the rulebook keeps a fallback hierarchy — full restoration first, then the circumflex when the source carries one, then the macron-only academic standard, then an attested variant, and only as a last resort the plain ASCII form. Every step down the ladder is still defensible; nothing on the ladder is a wrong mark. A fallback is a choice among attested forms. A false form is not on the ladder at all.

Where the Name Stood First

The Temple Mount in Jerusalem, now the Haram al-Sharif, is the traditional site of Solomon's Temple, though no Iron Age remains have been excavated there for religious and political reasons. Monumental six-chambered gates at Megiddo, Hazor, and Gezer have been attributed by some to Solomon's building program, while others date them later to the Omride dynasty. The site of Khirbet Qeiyafa and the Stepped Stone Structure in the City of David are debated as evidence of an early Judahite state. Saba (Sheba) in modern Yemen, with its dam and inscriptions at Marib, confirms the existence of the South Arabian kingdom that the Queen of Sheba legend reflects. The temple on the web is the newest of these addresses — the first one that fits in a pocket.

The Verdict

The register rules for Šəlōmōh, and the ruling is checkable: every mark sourced, every violation stated, every borderline form given its honest standing. solomon is the sanctioned fallback for systems without marks — a vehicle, never the scholarly primary. Anything else in circulation has its origin and its failure recorded above. That is the whole of the law on this name — and the temple at /sites/solomon/ enforces it.

The docket for this ruling: 2 false forms ruled against, Šəlomoh first on the docket; 2 preserved marks verified: o → ō, o → ō; no contested forms attested; the attestation rests on 7 cited sources — HALOT s.v. שְׁלֹמֹה, TDOT s.v. Solomon, 1 Kings 1–11; 2 Chronicles 1–9.

The Register Continues

Entry 239 of 287 in the Canonical Register. Around it: the temple's founding dispatch, the Restoration File on the marks themselves, the Resonance File on the archetype at work, and the Rulebook behind all of it.

Continue the register — previous entry: Sītā (read it) · next entry: Spártē (read it).

The Canonical Register is written from the same canonical record as the lexicon itself. If a false form is missing from this page, it is because the evidence does not support calling it false — or because we have not seen it yet. Show us, with a citation, and the register will answer.